Singh v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
| Harbans Singh |
| Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tae Johnson, Nathalie Asher and Steven Langford |
| United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Nathalie R Asher |
| 2:2022cv00548 |
| April 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #8 RESPONSE to Habeas Petition, #9 DECLARATION: Corrected/Updated document names. (AMD) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Hammer filed by Respondents Nathalie R Asher, Tae Johnson, Steven Langford, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement re #9 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Lundberg, Robert) |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Robert K Lundberg RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Nathalie R Asher, Tae Johnson, Steven Langford, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Noting Date 7/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Ex A, #2 Ex B, #3 Ex C, #4 Ex D, #5 Ex E, #6 Ex F, #7 Ex G, #8 Ex H, #9 Ex I, #10 Ex J, #11 Ex K, #12 Ex L, #13 Ex M, #14 Ex N, #15 Ex O, #16 Ex P, #17 Ex Q, #18 Ex R)(Lundberg, Robert) Modified on 6/6/2022 (AMD). |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Petition MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Respondents Nathalie R Asher, Tae Johnson, Steven Langford, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/1/2022. (Lundberg, Robert) Modified on 6/6/2022 (AMD). |
Filing 7
ORDER FOR RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, 2241 PETITION: Within 30 days of the date this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted by filing a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. 2243. If petitioner's custody status changes at any point during this litigation, respondent(s) shall file a status update with the Court as soon as possible and no later than 14 days after the change. Signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke. (AMD)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Robert K Lundberg on behalf of Respondents Nathalie R Asher, Tae Johnson, Steven Langford, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Lundberg, Robert) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lindsay M Vick on behalf of Respondents Nathalie R Asher, Tae Johnson, Steven Langford, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Vick, Lindsay) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Nathalie R Asher, Tae Johnson, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Steven Langford, filed by Harbans Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Frick, William) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Declining to Serve #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: The petition has not been signed by petitioner nor has petitioner's counsel provided a proper verification of the petition. The signature page or verification shall be filed on or before May 27, 2022. Signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke. (SP)
|
| Judge Benjamin H. Settle and Judge Theresa L Fricke added. (ST) |
| Filing 1 2241 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-7526955), filed by Harbans Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Frick, William) Modified on 4/26/2022 to remove duplicate description for attachment 1. (ST) Modified on 4/29/2022 - NEF regenerated to US Attorney Habeas (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
