Lemelson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
| Carolyn Lemelson and Pacific Doodles LLC |
| Wells Fargo Bank NA |
| 2:2022cv01202 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/18/2022, (Dove, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 14
JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 7. Filed by Plaintiffs Carolyn Lemelson, Pacific Doodles LLC.(Arnold, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 13
AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Wells Fargo Bank NA, filed by Carolyn Lemelson, Pacific Doodles LLC.(Arnold, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's #4 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in this order by no later than Friday, October 14, 2022. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Unavailability of counsel Nathan J Arnold for Plaintiff Carolyn Lemelson from 10/05/2022-6/16/2023. (Arnold, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY, filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA, TO RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dove, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE, by Plaintiffs Carolyn Lemelson, Pacific Doodles LLC, to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Arnold, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge James L. Robart. Joint Status Report due by 10/18/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/27/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/11/2022. (AD)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kelly H Dove on behalf of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Dove, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 6
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Pacific Doodles LLC (Arnold, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 5
PRAECIPE to attach document (Praecipe to replace Motion to Dismiss) re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit corrected Motion to Dismiss)(Rataezyk, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/30/2022, (Rataezyk, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 3
LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Skagit County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE)
|
|
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff Pacific Doodles LLC must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 9/6/2022. (RE)
|
|
Judge James L. Robart added. (RE)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo Bank NA. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA (Rataezyk, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Skagit County Superior Court, case number 22-2-00603-29; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7682845) Attorney Joshua A Rataezyk added to party Wells Fargo Bank NA(pty:dft), filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(Rataezyk, Joshua)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
