Aperture Net LLC v. Electric Mirror Inc
Aperture Net LLC |
Electric Mirror, Inc. and Electric Mirror Inc |
2:2022cv01533 |
October 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Thomas S Zilly |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office. (SR) |
![]() |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Aperture Net LLC (Mann, Philip) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (MJV) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Electric Mirror Inc (MJV) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 11/4/2022. (MJV) |
Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (MJV) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement against defendant(s) Electric Mirror, Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7756479) Attorney Philip P Mann added to party Aperture Net LLC(pty:pla), filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120), #4 Summons)(Mann, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.