Northwest Administrators Inc v. Sysco San Francisco Inc
| Northwest Administrators Inc |
| Sysco San Francisco, Inc. and Sysco San Francisco Inc |
| 2:2022cv01784 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 1-2. (Reid, Russell) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Sysco Corporation for Sysco San Francisco Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Sysco San Francisco Inc (Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Sysco San Francisco Inc.(Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 PRAECIPE re #7 Affidavit of Service of Summons and Complaint Served on 12/29/2022 by Plaintiff Northwest Administrators Inc (Reid, Russell) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Sysco San Francisco Inc on 12/29/2022 1/29/2023, filed by Plaintiff Northwest Administrators Inc. (Reid, Russell) Modified service date on 1/4/2023 (SS). |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Kadya Peter at kadya_peter@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/1/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/8/2023, Joint Status Report due by 2/15/2023. (KMP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ryan Paul Hammond on behalf of Defendant Sysco San Francisco Inc. (Hammond, Ryan) |
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KMP)
|
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Sysco San Francisco Inc (JWC) |
| U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (JWC) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Northwest Administrators Inc (Reid, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Collect Trust Funds Pursuant to Audit against defendant(s) Sysco San Francisco, Inc. (Receipt # AWAWDC-7816297), filed by Northwest Administrators Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Reid, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
