Crisologo v. Nordstrom Card Services Inc et al
| Daniel Galvin Crisologo |
| Nordstrom Card Services Inc and Michael Bengs |
| 2:2024cv00623 |
| May 6, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY, filed by Defendants Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc, TO RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay (Vivian, Priya) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Patrick Leo McGuigan filed by Plaintiff Daniel Galvin Crisologo re #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay (McGuigan, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Daniel Galvin Crisologo, to #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay. (McGuigan, Patrick) |
| ***Deadlines terminated. The Court acknowledges the requirements of FRCP 16(b), but finds good cause to VACATE the deadlines contained in the #8 ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT pending the Court's ruling on Defendants' #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay. (VE) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Justin Fischbeck filed by Defendants Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc re #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Reilly, D) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of D. Michael Reilly filed by Defendants Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc re #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay (Reilly, D) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay, filed by Defendants Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/13/2024, (Reilly, D) |
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 5/29/2024, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 6/5/2024, Joint Status Report due by 6/12/2024, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
|
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (RE) |
| Filing 5 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc.(Reilly, D) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Plaintiff re #1 Notice of Removal, ; filed by Defendants Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc. (Reilly, D) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Nordstrom Inc for Nordstrom Card Services Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by Nordstrom Card Services Inc. (Reilly, D) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of D. Michael Reilly re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendants Michael Bengs, Nordstrom Card Services Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Reilly, D) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 24-2-08222-1 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8456595) Attorney D Michael Reilly added to party Michael Bengs(pty:dft), Attorney D Michael Reilly added to party Nordstrom Card Services Inc(pty:dft) filed by Nordstrom Card Services Inc, Michael Bengs. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reilly, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
