CASE NUMBER NOT USED
William Gonzales, Stephanie Gonzales, Grizzly General Contractors Corp a Washington State Corporation doing business as Grizzly Septic Services and John and Jane Does 1-50 |
Kitsap Public Health District, Mike Harmon, Eric Evans, Harold Ball, Edwin North, Orenco Systems Inc, John and Jane Does 1-50, Online RME LLC and E-Onsite LLC |
2:2024cv01067 |
July 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated. Incorrect divisional office selected by filer. Please see 3:24-cv-05583-BHS for all filings in this matter. (KS) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Grizzly General Contractors, Corp. dba Grizzly Septic Services. (Chung, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8549992) Attorney Edward C Chung added to party Grizzly General Contractors, Corp. dba Grizzly Septic Services(pty:pla) filed by Grizzly General Contractors, Corp. dba Grizzly Septic Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-16, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Chung, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.