Giese v. Victoria's Secret Stores LLC
| Kealee Giese |
| Victoria's Secret Stores LLC |
| 2:2024cv01131 |
| July 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Bench Trial is set for 8/11/2025 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez (the court will not provide remote public access for this hearing). Length of Trial: *5 days*. Joinder of Parties due by 10/9/2024, Amended Pleadings due by 10/9/2024, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/12/2025, Motions due by 3/14/2025, Discovery completed by 4/14/2025, Dispositive motions due by 5/13/2025, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 6/27/2025, Motions in Limine due by 7/14/2025, Pretrial Order due by 7/30/2025, Trial briefs to be submitted by 8/6/2025, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 8/6/2025. (LC)
|
| Filing 5 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 5. (Jensen, Heather) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/3/2024, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/9/2024, Joint Status Report due by 9/16/2024. (LC)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Whatcom County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (KS) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (KS) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent IB US Retail Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Victoria's Secret & Co. for Victoria's Secret Stores LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by Victoria's Secret Stores LLC. (Jensen, Heather) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Whatcom County Superior Court, case number 24-2-00787-37; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8562505) filed by Victoria's Secret Stores LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jensen, Heather) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/1/2024 due to malformed PDF) (KS). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/1/2024: #2 Complaint) (KS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Giese v. Victoria's Secret Stores LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Victoria's Secret Stores LLC | |
| Represented By: | Wonjin Lee Kim |
| Represented By: | Heather M. Jensen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kealee Giese | |
| Represented By: | Karen K. Orehoski |
| Represented By: | Joseph Andrew Grube |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
