Northwest Carpenters Health and Security Trust et al v. Greyrock Drilling & Piledriving LLC et al
| 2:2024mc00088 |
| March 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ON GARNISHEE'S ANSWER AND ORDER TO PAY re 10 Amended MOTION for Judgment on Answer of Garnishee Defendant and for an Order to Pay. Based on the above findings by the Court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against Garnishee Defendant Pacific Premier Bank, N.A. in the amount of $26,575.58. Signed by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. (RE)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 7 Motion for Judgment on Answer of Garnishee Defendant and for an Order to Pay. In sum, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs, within FOURTEEN (14) days of this Order, to show cause why the Court should grant the requested relief despite the above-listed issues or amend and re-file their Motion for Judgment to rectify these issues. Signed by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. (RE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Northwest Carpenters Health and Security Trust et al v. Greyrock Drilling & Piledriving LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
