Brodiski v. Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Jennifer Brodiski
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Case Number: 2:2025cv00112
Filed: January 16, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER to Consolidate. Case No. 2:25-cv-00112-RSM shall be consolidated under Case No. 2:25-cv-00088- RSM. The case schedule for Case No. 2:25-cv-00088-RSM shall govern. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (TE)
February 20, 2025 Filing 16 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-00306-JNW, by Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski. (Pradhan, Joan)
February 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/20/2025, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/27/2025, Joint Status Report due by 4/3/2025. (LC)
February 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER. The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable James L. Robart: This case is hereby transferred to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez as related to C25-0088RSM. All future documents filed in this case shall bear the case number C25-0112RSM. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (TE)
February 19, 2025 Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. Judge James L. Robart no longer assigned to case per #14 MINUTE ORDER. (TE)
February 18, 2025 Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Burnside, Fred)
February 18, 2025 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Fred B Burnside on behalf of Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Burnside, Fred)
February 6, 2025 CASE REASSIGNED to Judge James L. Robart for all further proceedings. Judge Tana Lin is no longer assigned to the case. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number 2:25-CV-0112-JLR. (KMP)
February 5, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-00205-MJP, 2:25-cv-00209-RSM, 2:25-cv-00137-JLR, 2:25-cv-00203, by Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski. (Pradhan, Joan)
February 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #9 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorneys Adam E Polk,Simon S Grille for Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
February 3, 2025 Filing 9 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Simon S. Grille FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8824943 (Dennett, Jason)
February 3, 2025 Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Adam E. Polk FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8824932 (Dennett, Jason)
January 31, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-00185, by Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski. (Dennett, Jason)
January 27, 2025 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at #https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (KMP)
January 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (KMP)
January 17, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-00088-BAT, by Plaintiff Jennifer Brodiski. (Dennett, Jason)
January 17, 2025 Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Microsoft Corporation (HH)
January 17, 2025 Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Notice of Related Cases Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Notice of Related Case must be filed by 1/22/2025. (HH)
January 17, 2025 Judge Tana Lin added. (HH)
January 16, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Jennifer Brodiski with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8802553) filed by Jennifer Brodiski. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dennett, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brodiski v. Microsoft Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Brodiski
Represented By: Joan Maya Pradhan
Represented By: Jason T Dennett
Represented By: Simon S Grille
Represented By: Simon S Grille
Represented By: Adam E Polk
Represented By: Adam E Polk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Fred B Burnside
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?