State of Washington et al v. Trump et al
State of Washington, State of California, State of Arizona, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, People of the State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of New Jersey, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont and State of Wisconsin |
Donald Trump, Daniel Driscoll, William H Graham, Jr, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Travis Voyles and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation |
2:2025cv00869 |
May 9, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Jamal N Whitehead |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Daniel Driscoll, William H Graham, Jr, Donald Trump, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Travis Voyles. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (RE) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Caitlin Soden on behalf of Plaintiff State of Washington. (Soden, Caitlin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Dylan Stonecipher on behalf of Plaintiff State of Washington. (Stonecipher, Dylan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Janell Marie Middleton on behalf of Plaintiff State of Washington. (Middleton, Janell) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kelly Thomas Wood on behalf of Plaintiff State of Washington. (Wood, Kelly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8969909) Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party Commonwealth of Massachusetts(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party People of the State of Michigan(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Arizona(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of California(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Connecticut(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Illinois(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Maine(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Maryland(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Minnesota (pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of New Jersey(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Oregon(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Rhode Island (pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Vermont(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Washington(pty:pla), Attorney Kelly Thomas Wood added to party State of Wisconsin (pty:pla) filed by State of New Jersey, State of Maryland, State of California, State of Washington, State of Rhode Island, State of Maine, State of Arizona, People of the State of Michigan, State of Oregon, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Connecticut, State of Minnesota, State of Illinois. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons, #18 Summons, #19 Summons, #20 Summons)(Wood, Kelly) |
Judge Jamal N Whitehead added. (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.