USA v. Holmes
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Bradley Holmes
Case Number: 3:2008cv05066
Filed: February 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Contract: Recovery Student Loan Office
County: Pierce
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 20:1080 Student Loan Recovery

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Default Judgment- default judgment entered against defendant Bradley Holmes in amount of $7,176.70 plus interest at 7% until entry of judgment on principal of $2,500, interest to accrue on total judgment at legal rate until fully paid and costs in the amount of $638.20. by Clerk Bruce Rifkin.(BR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Anastasia D. Bartlett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?