Ostrand v. Pacific Tech Construction, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Jonathan W. Ostrand
Defendant: Pacific Tech Construction, Inc. and Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company
Case Number: 3:2012cv05806
Filed: September 10, 2012
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Cowlitz
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ostrand v. Pacific Tech Construction, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan W. Ostrand
Represented By: David A Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Tech Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Angela R. Vogel
Represented By: David W Silke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company
Represented By: Angela R. Vogel
Represented By: David W Silke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.