Daniels v. Van Hook

Plaintiff: Burt Daniels
Defendant: Van Hook
Case Number: 3:2016cv05874
Filed: October 12, 2016
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Pierce
Referring Judge: David W. Christel
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 15, 2017 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 12 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. This case is now closed and consolidated into the Lead Case; Malone et al v Strong et al, No. 3:16-cv-05284-RBL-DWC. All further documents and pleadings are to be filed in the lead case only. No further filings are to be filed in this matter. (GMR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniels v. Van Hook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Burt Daniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Van Hook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?