Porter v. Porter
Fontaine Porter |
Richard A Porter |
3:2017cv05852 |
October 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Mason |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. #1] is DENIED. Porter shall pay the filing fee or file a proposed amended complaint addressing these deficiencies and satisfying the standard above within 21 days or this matter will be DISMISSED. (Copy mailed to Pltf @ Shelton address.)(DK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Porter v. Porter | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fontaine Porter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Richard A Porter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.