Gilmore v. State of Washington

Petitioner: Paul Alan Gilmore
Respondent: State of Washington
Case Number: 3:2018cv05496
Filed: June 18, 2018
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Grays Harbor
Referring Judge: David W. Christel
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 26, 2018 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Substituting Respondent and DIRECTING SERVICE on Ron Haynes and WA State Attorney General's Office via email, signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: # 1 pro se instruction sheet)**4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Paul Gilmore, Prisoner ID: 382868)(CMG)(copy of service order and petition with attachments emailed on 6/26/18 to Ron Haynes & WA State AG's office.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilmore v. State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul Alan Gilmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?