Merrill v. Commissioner of Social Security
Burton T Merrill |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
3:2018cv05774 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ronald B Leighton |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Denying #4 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (Copy mailed to Pltf @ Vancouver address.)(DK) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Case Management deadline 11/7/2018. Complaint & filing fee due or dismiss. (DK) |
Filing 4 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Burton T Merrill. (GMR) |
***Motion terminated: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - AMENDED IFP Motion received; IFP deficiency corrected. (GMR) |
Filing 3 LETTER mailed to plaintiff re IFP deficiency: - Signature is missing from the document(s). Please sign as appropriate. Filer has until 10/31/2018 to correct. (GMR) |
Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (CMG)(cc mailed to Plaintiff at the PO Box in Vancouver.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Burton T Merrill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 email verification)(CMG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.