Hegar v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Mary Annette Hegar |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2018cv05845 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ronald B Leighton |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to AG USA on 12/3/2018, filed by Plaintiff Mary Annette Hegar. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to OGC on 11/30/2018, filed by Plaintiff Mary Annette Hegar. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to US Atty WDWA on 11/30/2018, filed by Plaintiff Mary Annette Hegar. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security. (GMR) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Mary Annette Hegar. (Summons(es) as provided by plaintiff to be electronically issued) (IFP Granted) (GMR) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; as directed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
| Judge Ronald B. Leighton added. (MET) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Mary Annette Hegar. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Meserow, Nancy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
