Barber v. Bremerton Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Danny Joe Barber, III
Defendant: Police Officer Doe 1, Witness and Bremerton Police Department
Case Number: 3:2024cv05725
Filed: August 26, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Referring Judge: Michelle L Peterson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson re #6 Complaint. Plaintiff shall show cause not later than thirty (30) days from the date on which this Order is signed why his proposed complaint and this action should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Failure to timely respond to this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed Show Cause Response due by 11/21/2024. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (CR)
October 22, 2024 Filing 6 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Danny Joe Barber, III against defendant(s) Bremerton Police Department, Police Officer Doe 1, Witness (CR)
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD PAYMENTS by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (cc: Plaintiff, WAWD Finance, Kitsap County Jail Finance Dept via USPS.) (CR)
September 19, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Michelle L. Peterson filed by Danny Joe Barber, III. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prison Trust Account Statement)(MIH)
September 19, 2024 IFP deficiency corrected (MIH)
August 30, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** 1983 Filing Fee Not Paid, Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 9/30/2024 to correct IFP application (MIH)(cc: Plaintiff with IFP Form via USPS)
August 26, 2024 Filing 1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint (NO IFP/NO FILING FEE) filed by Plaintiff Danny Joe Barber, III (MIH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber v. Bremerton Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Joe Barber, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Witness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bremerton Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?