Akana v. The Kroger Company et al
Floripina Akana |
Gatekeeper Systems Inc and The Kroger Company an Ohio corporation doing business as Fred Meyer Stores Inc |
3:2024cv05964 |
November 18, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
David G Estudillo |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Noting Date Reset: #17 MOTION to Remand is noted for 1/31/2025. (MGC) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER Defendants are ordered to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (Dkt. No. #17 .) Defendants shall have until January 24, 2025 to respond. Plaintiff may file a reply, if any, by January 31, 2025. If no response is filed, the Court will grant the motion as unopposed. Authorized by U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo. (MDH) |
Filing 21 Notice of Filing Deficiency re Add and Terminate Attorneys, #11 Notice of Attorney Association. ***Action Required*** Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. cc Attorney Lucido via ad hoc(CDA) |
![]() |
Filing 19 DECLARATION of Thaddeus Martin filed by Plaintiff Floripina Akana re #17 MOTION to Remand (Martin, Thaddeus) |
Filing 18 DECLARATION of Heather Delin filed by Plaintiff Floripina Akana re #17 MOTION to Remand (Martin, Thaddeus) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff Floripina Akana. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 12/27/2024, (Martin, Thaddeus) |
Filing 16 Def Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal, with JURY DEMAND by Gatekeeper Systems Inc.(Floyd, Francis) |
Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent GKP Acquisition, Inc., Corporate Parent GKP Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent GKP Holdings Partnership, L.P. for Gatekeeper Systems Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Gatekeeper Systems Inc. (Urban, Skyler) |
Filing 14 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by All Plaintiffs (Martin, Thaddeus) |
Filing 13 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal,. ***Action Required*** Notice of Removal - Jury Demand Improperly Submitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CDA) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Unavailability of counsel Thaddeus P Martin for Plaintiff Floripina Akana from Various dates 2024 and 2025. (Martin, Thaddeus) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Jennifer L Crow on behalf of Defendant The Kroger Company. (Crow, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 PRAECIPE to attach document Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant The Kroger Company (Crow, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s), Notice of Removal - Complaint Not Provided.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MIH)(cc Kathryn P. Lucido via Ad Hoc) |
Filing 8 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Pierce County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. JURY DEMAND - properly submitted federal court jury demand on file (MIH) |
Attorney Kathryn Patricia Lucido added for The Kroger Company; per #11 Notice of Attorney Association. (MW) |
NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), Defendant Gatekeeper Systems Inc must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 11/29/2024. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents.(MIH) |
NOTICE TO FILER: ***Case Terminated-Incorrect Division*** Civil case number 2:24-cv-01897 has been terminated. The incorrect divisional office was selected by the filer upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Tacoma case number. All future filings shall bear the following case number and Judge assignment: 3:24-cv-05964-DGE. Before initiating a new case, please review the #Attorney Case Opening Guide (PDF) to determine the correct divisional jurisdiction. (MIH) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Skyler P Urban on behalf of Defendant Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.. (Urban, Skyler) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Francis S Floyd on behalf of Defendant Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.. (Floyd, Francis) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Kroger Co. for The Kroger Company Fred Meyer Stores Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by The Kroger Company. (Crow, Jennifer) Modified on 11/21/2024 to fix language to match pleading (MIH). |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by The Kroger Company. (Crow, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET; filed by Plaintiff The Kroger Company. (Crow, Jennifer) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/21/2024) to replace malformed PDF (MIH). |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Jennifer L. Crow re #1 Notice of Removal by Plaintiff The Kroger Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Crow, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pierce County Superior Court, case number 24-2-10915-9; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8722066) Attorney Jennifer L Crow added to party The Kroger Company(pty:pla) filed by The Kroger Company.(Crow, Jennifer) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2024: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (MIH). Modified on 11/21/2024 (MIH) to attach Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.