Le v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
| Kim Hong Thi Le |
| Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Office of Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) and James T Hayes, Jr. |
| 1:2008cv00212 |
| December 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Preston |
| John S. Kaull |
| Irene M Keeley |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to 24 Opinion/Report and Recommendation. GRANTS as to 17 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DENIES Les Application for Habeas Corpus under § 2241. ORDERS the case DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and stricken from the Courts docket. Signed by District Judge Irene M Keeley on 5/13/2009.(Copy counsel of record and pro se petitioner by certified mail) (jmm)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kim Hong Thi Le and 17 MOTION to Dismiss , or in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 4/21/2009.(Copy counsel of record, pro se petitioner by certified mail). (jmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
