Jones v. United States et al
||Michael Anthony Jones
||United States, BOP Agency, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., J. F. Caraway, C. Eichenlaub, Terry O'Brien, W. Odom, Gregory S. Mims, II, Jamie Hamilton and C. Lafluer
||March 20, 2015
||US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
||Irene M. Keeley
||Robert W. Trumble
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 16, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DKT. NO. 175], AND VACATING-IN-PART ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DKT. NO. 149] AND REOPENING THE CASE: The Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Jones motion for relief from judgment (Dkt. No. 175 ); GRANTS Jones motions for leave to supplement his Rule 60(b) motion (Dkt. Nos. 177 ; 178 ); DENIES as MOOT Jones motion for leave to supplement newly discovered evidence (Dkt. No . 184 ); VACATES-IN-PART its earlier Order insofar as it dismissed Jones FTCA claim (Dkt. No. 149 ) and REOPENS the case; GRANTS Jones LEAVE to secure and file a medical screeningcertificate of merit with the Court within ninety (90) days followin g entry of this Order; and REFERS this case to Magistrate Judge Trumble for furtherproceedings consistent with this Opinion, and also DIRECTS him to consider Jones motions for appointed counsel (Dkt. Nos. 176 ; 178 ). Signed by Senior Judge Irene M. Keeley on 5/16/18. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(jss)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?