McNemar v. Plumley

Petitioner: Richard B. McNemar
Respondent: Marvin Plumley
Case Number: 2:2013cv00027
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Elkins Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: David J. Joel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 10, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 4 Motion for Holding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Abeyance. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 5/10/13. copy mailed to pro se pet via cert. return rec't mail(njz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/10/2013: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (njz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNemar v. Plumley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard B. McNemar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marvin Plumley
Represented By: Robert D Goldberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.