Aikens et al v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al
Donna Aikens and Willard Aikens |
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co. Inc. |
3:2018cv00143 |
September 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Gina M Groh |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Transfer Complete - Case transferred to Eastern District of Pennsylvania on 09/24/2018. Eastern District of Pennsylvania's case number is 2:18-cv-20109. (cwm) |
Filing 3 CERTIFIED COPY OF JPML CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-5) MDL No. 2848. 8 action(s) re: pldg. (1 in LAW/3:18-cv-01187, 88 in MDL No. 2848, 1 in NJ/2:18-cv-13262, 1 in NJ/2:18-cv-13540, 1 in NJ/2:18-cv-13548, 1 in NJ/3:18-cv-13767, 1 in NJ/3:18-cv-13796, 1 in NYE/2:18-cv-05125, 1 in WVN/3:18-cv-00143) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. This case is transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and assigned to the Honorable Harvey Bartle, III. (Signed by Jeffrey N. Luthi, Clerk on 9/21/2018). (cwm) |
Case transferred to Eastern District of Pennsylvania re: MDL 2848. Entire Case file electronically transmitted. (cwm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merck & Co. Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., filed by Donna Aikens and Willard Aikens. Filing Fee $400.00 - Receipt #0424-2661580. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (cwm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.