Rogers v. Jenkins et al
| Cynthia Ann Rogers |
| Jason Scott Jenkins and Federal Express Corporation |
| 3:2020cv00005 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Federal Express Corporation (Mincer, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James W. Marshall, III on behalf of Federal Express Corporation (Marshall, James) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Mincer on behalf of Federal Express Corporation (Mincer, David) |
Filing 3
FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 1/9/2020. (tlg)
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Jason Scott Jenkins.(George, E.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Berkeley County, West Virginia, (case number 19-c-305), filed by Jason Scott Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, state court documents; #2 Exhibit B, state court docket sheet; #3 Civil Cover Sheet). Filing Fee $400 - Receipt #0424-2964666(tlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
