Smith v. Bowers
Petitioner: Dennis Smith
Respondent: F.J. Bowers
Case Number: 3:2021cv00121
Filed: July 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: Gina M Groh
2 Judge: James P Mazzone
3 Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2021 Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 Order Dismissing Case. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/12/2021. (tlg)
August 10, 2021 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dennis Smith re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cmd)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Petitioners Motion to Amend Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [Doc. #7 ] is DENIED. Petitioners Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [Doc. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 8/9/2021. Copy to pro se pet by cm,rr.(cmd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/9/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cmd).
August 5, 2021 Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/3/2021. (cmd)
August 4, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Order/Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/2/2021. (cmd)
August 2, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dennis Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cmd)
July 30, 2021 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 7/28/2021. (cmd)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASES. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 7/30/2021. Copy to pro se petitioner by cm,rrr.(cmd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cmd).
July 26, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO STRIKE PLEADING AND DISMISS ACTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 7/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form). Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2021: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cmd).
July 23, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/23/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
July 23, 2021 Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNC003263 (tlg)
July 23, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against F.J. Bowers, filed by Dennis Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, memorandum; #2 Attachment B, affidavit, #3 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and law clerk Sims.(tlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: F.J. Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?