Gilmore v. Saad
Petitioner: Jesse T. Gilmore
Respondent: Jennifer Saad
Case Number: 5:2018cv00090
Filed: May 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Wheeling Office
County: Gilmer
Presiding Judge: James E. Seibert
Presiding Judge: Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 CLERK'S JUDGMENT : Adopting & Affirming R/R, DENYING AND DISMISSING WITHOUT PREUDICE H.C. Petition, and Striking civil action from docket of this Court. Signed by Cheryl Dean Riley, Clerk, on 7/30/19. (soa)(copy to Petitioner by cert. mail) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2019: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilmore v. Saad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse T. Gilmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jennifer Saad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?