Sharp v. Hudgins
Petitioner: Timothy Wayne Sharp
Respondent: K. Hudgins
Case Number: 5:2019cv00314
Filed: November 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
2 Judge: Frederick P Stamp
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2020 Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/9/20. (lmm)
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that both petitioner's #2 motion to proceed without prepayment of fees and petitioner's #10 motion for expedited review filed January 6, 2019 are TERMINATED as MOOT. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/7/20. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/7/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
January 6, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION FOR THE EXPEDITED REVIEW OF #1 2241 PETITION by Timothy Wayne Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)
January 2, 2020 Filing 9 Case Reassigned to District Judge John Preston Bailey per Order entered in 3:20MC1. Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr no longer assigned to the case. There are no hearings scheduled before the District Judge to be reset at this time. (cmd)
November 25, 2019 Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/21/19. (lmm)
November 25, 2019 Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Notice #4 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/20/19. (lmm)
November 19, 2019 Filing 6 CORRECTED NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT re #4 Notice. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/19/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
November 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
November 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
November 18, 2019 Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Timothy Wayne Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)
November 18, 2019 Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timothy Wayne Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)
November 18, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against K. Hudgins, filed by Timothy Wayne Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A - Detention Report, #3 Envelope)(Exhibit sealed per Judge Stamp) (lmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sharp v. Hudgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K. Hudgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Wayne Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?