Overla #22546-040 v. United States of America
Petitioner: Craig David Overla #22546-040
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2021cv00156
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Wheeling Office
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2021 Filing 10 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/8/21 per USPS. (lmm)
October 12, 2021 Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order Dismissing Case. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/8/2021. (ag)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION: pursuant to the terms of the Notice, the Court ORDERS that this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and pending Motion to Appoint Counsel #2 be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/6/2021. (ag) (pro se PET cm rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/6/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag).
September 8, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/3/21. (lmm)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 2241 Form) (Petitioner via CM/rrr)(lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/1/2021: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
September 1, 2021 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Michigan Western; Case Number 1:21-cv-00734. (lmm)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Northern District of West Virginia; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks) [Transferred from Michigan Western on 9/1/2021.]
August 31, 2021 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Davin Maitland Reust on behalf of respondent United States of America (Reust, Davin) [Transferred from Michigan Western on 9/1/2021.]
August 26, 2021 Copy of Deficiency Order, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Craig David Overla #22546-040 (jem) [Transferred from Michigan Western on 9/1/2021.]
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER: petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 9/22/2021 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln) [Transferred from Michigan Western on 9/1/2021.]
August 23, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to appoint counsel by petitioner Craig David Overla #22546-040; (pjw) [Transferred from Michigan Western on 9/1/2021.]
August 23, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Craig David Overla #22546-040 (pjw) [Transferred from Michigan Western on 9/1/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Overla #22546-040 v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Craig David Overla #22546-040
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Davin Maitland Reust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?