Bartusek v. Bayless
Petitioner: Michael Bartusek
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Case Number: 5:2022cv00222
Filed: September 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2023 Filing 19 Mail sent to Michael Bartusek #18 Order Returned as Undeliverable. Inmate no longer at this facility. (ag)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION. Respondent's #11 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/12/23. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/12/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
December 12, 2022 Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by M.J. Bayless. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Attachment, #3 Exhibit)(Nogay, Maximillian)
December 6, 2022 Filing 16 SUBMISSION OF EXHIBIT I AND EXHIBIT III FOR #15 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2022 filed by Michael Bartusek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I - FSA Time Credit Assessment, #2 Exhibit III Program Review, #3 Envelope; exhibit sealed per J. Bailey)(lmm)
November 28, 2022 Filing 15 RESPONSE TO #11 MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT [sic] filed by Michael Bartusek. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)
November 10, 2022 Filing 14 RETURN RECEIPT as to #13 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/8/22. (lmm)
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ROSEBORO ORDER TO PETITIONER re #11 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by M.J. Bayless, ROSEBORO NOTICE: re #11 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by M.J. Bayless. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the pro se party shall file any opposition to the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 11/4/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
November 3, 2022 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by M.J. Bayless re #11 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Attachment A, #3 Attachment B, #4 Attachment C, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Attachment A, #7 Attachment B, #8 Attachment C, #9 Attachment D, #10 Exhibit 3, #11 Attachment A, #12 Attachment B)(Nogay, Maximillian)
November 3, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by M.J. Bayless. (Nogay, Maximillian)
November 3, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION FOR NOVEMBER 1, 2022 RELEASE TO HOME CONFINEMENT AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Michael Bartusek. (Attachments: #1 Envelope 1 - Inmate Request, #2 Envelope)(lmm)
October 18, 2022 Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/13/22. (lmm)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answer due 11/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/11/2022. (ag)(pro se PET cm rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/11/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
October 7, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by M.J. Bayless. (Nogay, Maximillian)
September 21, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/19/22. (lmm)
September 20, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/15/22 per USPS. (lmm)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/15/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr; AUSA via US Mail) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/15/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
September 13, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
September 13, 2022 Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNW003059 (lmm)
September 13, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against M.J. Bayless, filed by Michael Bartusek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Initial Classifcation, #2 Exhibit 2 - Sentence Monitoring, #3 Exhibit 3 - Program Review, #4 Exhibit 4 - Sentence Monitoring, #5 Exhibit 5 - Resolution Form, #6 Exhibit 6 - Administrative Remedy, #7 Envelope) (exhibits sealed per J. Bailey) (lmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartusek v. Bayless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Bartusek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Represented By: Christopher James Prezioso
Represented By: Maximillian F. Nogay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?