Skeens v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Tom Skeens |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 5:2022cv00289 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Michael John Aloi |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security/Social Security Administration, Attorney General and US Attorney for the Northern District of West Virginia served on 12/12/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND AFFIDAVIT: the Court GRANTS #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Procced In Forma Pauperis, and GRANTS #3 the Request for Service of Process by United States Marshal. The Clerk of the Court SHALL issue the summons and send to the U.S. Marshal Service, who shall serve the summons and Complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 12/2/2022. (nmm)
|
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Tom Skeens. (nmm) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tom Skeens. (nmm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Tom Skeens. (Attachments: #1 Assignment of EAJA Fees, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
