Nekvasil et al v. Rehberg et al
1:2006cv00305 |
April 27, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 24 the PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; GRANTING 16 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment; DENYING 15 Plaintiff's APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis; DISMISSING [1, 4] Plaintiff's Complaint as amended and DIRECTING the Clerk to remove this action from the active docket of this court. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 8/28/2009. (cc: Plaintiff and counsel of record) (arb) |
Filing 24 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort RECOMMENDING that the District Court DENY the 15 APPLICATION by Francis Nekvasil to Proceed in forma pauperis, GRANT defendants' 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment, DI SMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and as amended 4 and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 8/21/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 8/4/2009. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nekvasil et al v. Rehberg et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.