Brian Blankenship v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District Brian Blankenship v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.

Brian Blankenship v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Brian Blankenship
Defendant:	T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2013cv08048
Filed:	April 15, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Bluefield Office
County:	Mercer
Presiding Judge:	David A. Faber
Presiding Judge:	R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit:	Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 18, 2014	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Court ADOPTS the 13 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge VanDervort; GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 3 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion to Refer to arbitration filed by T.D. Ameritrade, Inc. Specifically, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss and refer to arbitration. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 2/18/2014. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)
November 5, 2013	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court OVERRULES plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort's PF&R. The Court ADOPTS the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, GRANTS defendant's 7 MOTION for relief from judgment, and refers this matter back to Magistrate Judge VanDervort for further proceedings. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 11/5/2013. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 18, 2014

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Court ADOPTS the 13 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge VanDervort; GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 3 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion to Refer to arbitration filed by T.D. Ameritrade, Inc. Specifically, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss and refer to arbitration. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 2/18/2014. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)

November 5, 2013

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court OVERRULES plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort's PF&R. The Court ADOPTS the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, GRANTS defendant's 7 MOTION for relief from judgment, and refers this matter back to Magistrate Judge VanDervort for further proceedings. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 11/5/2013. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Blankenship v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Blankenship
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.
Represented By:	Mychal Sommer Schulz
Represented By:	Katherine M. Santmyer
Represented By:	Arie M. Spitz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?