Hlushmanuk v. Rickard
| William Hlushmanuk |
| Barbara Rickard |
| 1:2019cv00051 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER AND NOTICE re: Respondent's #11 Response to Show Cause Order: If Petitioner chooses to file a reply in opposition to the response, Petitioner's reply shall be filed on or before 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 3/8/2019. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE by Barbara Rickard to the Court's #7 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Tessman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by Andrew J. Tessman appearing on behalf of Barbara Rickard. (Tessman, Andrew)
|
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #8 Return Receipt Card received from Barbara Rickard, Warden re: #7 Order to Show Cause. ERROR: Incorrect image attached. CORRECTION: Incorrect image removed and replaced with correct image) (mk).
|
|
Filing 9
RETURN RECEIPT CARD received by V. Dickerson on behalf of United States Attorney re: #7 Order to Show Cause. (arb)
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Barbara Rickard, Warden re: #7 Order to Show Cause. (arb) (Modified on 2/5/2019 to remove incorrect image; image replaced) (mk).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER as to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and Memorandum in Support: Respondent shall by 3/12/2019 file an Answer to the allegations contained in Petitioner's Petition and show cause, if any, why the Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be granted. Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a Reply or Objections to Respondent's Answer by 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/29/2019. (Attachment: #1 Certified Mail Receipts-Respondent & USA) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition and Memo in Support) (arb)
|
|
Filing 6
Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number CHAR015401. (arb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner shall have 20 days from the date of entry of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee, or submit the appropriate Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with the Certificate portion completed and Authorization to Release Institutional Account Information. Failure of the Petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a proper Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 20 days from the date of this Order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this matter without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/23/2019. (cc: Petitioner w/Form Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Authorization to Release Institutional Account Information and to Pay Filing Fee) (arb)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: #2 Memorandum in Support: The undersigned notes that Exhibits A, C, and D contain confidential or sensitive information. Specifically, Exhibits A and C include pertinent pages from the United States' Sentencing Memorandum and Petitioner's Presentence Report. Exhibit D contains Petitioner's date of birth and social security number. It is hereby ORDERED that Exhibits A, C, and D shall be filed under SEAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/17/2019. (cc: Petitioner, pro se) (mk)
|
|
Filing 2
PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW by William Hlushmanuk in Support of His #1 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition That's Consistent with the Criteria Set Forth in U.S. v. Wheeler, 2018 U.S App Lexis 775 (4th Cir. 2018) Applied to Petitioner's (State "Aggravated Assault") Pursuant to 18 PA.C.S. 2702(A) Offense (Now) Invalid in Light of Abundant Circuit Law Eliminating Petitioner from (Criminal Liability) under his Health Care Fraud, Conspiracy to Commit Health Care Fraud Case in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 1347; 1349, 1035. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 SEALED Exhibits A, C and D) (mk). (Modified on 1/17/2019 to add sealed exhibits per #3 Order) (mk).
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by William Hlushmanuk against Barbara Rickard, Warden, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (mk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hlushmanuk v. Rickard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Barbara Rickard | |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Tessman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Hlushmanuk | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
