Neeley v. Saul
| Candy Carole Neeley |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2019cv00598 |
| August 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| David A Faber |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by US Marshal for Attorney General of the United States, re: #5 Summons Issued as to USA. Person Served: Illegible. (mk) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by US Marshal for Commissioner of Social Security re: #5 Summons Issued as to USA. Person Served: illegible. (mk) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by US Marshal for United States Attorney re: #5 Summons Issued as to USA. United States Attorney served on 9/9/2019, answer due 11/8/2019. Person Served: V. Dickerson. (mk) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED by the Clerk on behalf of Candy Carole Neeley for Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, re: #2 Complaint, returnable 60 days. Original Summons and 1 copy mailed to USM for service. (Attachment: #1 Form USM-285 (3)) (arb) |
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs and Fees: The #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs and Fees is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall issue the summonses and provide the summonses and complaint to the United States Marshals for service. The recovery, if any, obtained in this action shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who shall pay therefrom all unpaid costs and fees taxed against Plaintiff and pay the balance to Plaintiff and her attorney, if any attorney enters an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff. Plaintiff is to file and serve a brief in support of her complaint within 30 days after the Commissioner has filed an Answer and Transcript of the Proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 8/21/2019. (cc: Plaintiff with copy of Local Rules of Civil Procedure 9.1 through 9.9; counsel of record and USM) (arb)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (mk) (Modified on 8/15/2019 to correct image) (mk). |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Candy Carole Neeley to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (mk) |
| CASE assigned to Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #2 Complaint. ERROR: Incorrect image attached. CORRECTION: Image replaced. (mk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Neeley v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Nora R. Koch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Candy Carole Neeley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
