Barron v. Ames
Petitioner: Harry A. Barron
Respondent: Donald Ames
Case Number: 1:2020cv00498
Filed: July 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Benjamin F. Yancey, III on behalf of Donald Ames. (Yancey, Benjamin)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254): On or before 60 days from entry of this Order, Respondent shall answer the Petition showing cause why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 8/14/2020. (cc: Petitioner; Attorney General of the State of WV w/copy of 2254 Petition) (arb)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1BLUE001712. (arb)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying Petitioner's #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of Court on or before 9/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 7/28/2020. (cc: Petitioner; Attorney General, State of West Virginia) (mk)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING OF PETITION UNDER 28 USC 2254 FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (mk)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
July 23, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #1 Application by Harry A. Barron to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. ERROR: Attachment contained incorrect image. CORRECTION: Image replaced. (mk)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Harry A. Barron against Donald Ames, Superintendent, Mt. Olive, WV, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2254. (arb)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 APPLICATION by Harry A. Barron to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Attachment: #1 Resident Transaction Details) (arb) (Modified on 7/23/2020 to replace incorrect image) (mk).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barron v. Ames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harry A. Barron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Donald Ames
Represented By: Karen Villanueva-Matkovich
Represented By: Benjamin F. Yancey, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?