Thomas v. Westfall et al
| Terry Thomas |
| Mary Westfall, David Miller, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., James Rubenstein, David Ballard, ACA, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 2:2008cv00126 |
| March 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Fayette |
| David A. Faber |
| Mary E. Stanley |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
179
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 161 MOTION for Summary Judgment; adopting 170 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; directing the Clerk to remove this case from the court's docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 3/18/2011. (cc: plaintiff; attys) (tmh)
|
|
Filing
150
MEMORANDUM OPINION OVERRULING plaintiff's 139 objections to the magistrate judge's PF & R; as set forth in the court's order of 09/30/09, CONFIRMING AND ACCEPTING the magistrate judge's 135 findings; granting the 113 motion for summary judgment of the CMS defendants; granting the 82 motion to dismiss filed by the DOC defendants; denying the 119 motion to dismiss filed by the Wexford defendants; denying as moot the cross-claims of the DOC defendants against the CMS defendants; and REFERRING this matter to Magistrate Judge Stanley for further proceedings consistent with her 07/24/09 recommendation. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 11/6/2009. (cc: pro se plaintiff, attys) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
