Stock et al v. Rutherford et al
| Rodolfo Stock and Ella Stock |
| Mike Rutherford, James Stucky, Joe Shelton, Paul Zakaib, Frank Coulter, Linda Coulter, Charles King and Sue Sanson |
| 2:2009cv00233 |
| March 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Kanawha |
| John T. Copenhaver, Jr. |
| Mary E. Stanley |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the magistrate judge's 31 Proposed Findings and Recommendation herein except as otherwise provided herein; granting the Sheriff's 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting the Coulter's 16 Motion to Dismiss; granting the remaining defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss; denying the plaintiffs' 33 Motions to amend the complaint to add their son, Joseph Stock, as an additional plaintiff, and for a hearing; this action is dis missed and stricken from the docket, with the dismissal of the claims against the Coulters being without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/24/2010. (cc: attys, the pro se plaintiffs, and the United States Magistrate Judge) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
31
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (recommending that the presiding District Judge GRANT the respective Defendants' 13 , 16 and 18 motions to dismiss, and dismiss this matter from the docket of the court); This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 1/19/2010. (cc: Plaintiffs, attys) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
