Haynes v. Amherst Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: Paul Haynes
Defendant: Amherst Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2010cv01073
Filed: September 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying the parties' 27 JOINT MOTION to File Settlement Agreements Under Seal; in light of this ruling, the 26 JOINT MOTION for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal may be withdrawn within 14 days. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/2/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. Amherst Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Haynes
Represented By: Mark L. French
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amherst Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?