Peterson v. Invent-Tech et al

Peterson v. Invent-Tech et al

Plaintiff:	Brent Alan Peterson
Defendant:	Invent Tech and Sam Artioli
Case Number:	2:2011cv00867
Filed:	November 30, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	Mary E. Stanley
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 11, 2012	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 27 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; directing that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/11/2012. (cc: pro se plaintiff; Invent Tech at 2655 Lejune Road Suite 550, Coral Gables, Florida 33134; Brett Pollack, Esq., at 9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor, Miami, Florida 33153; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)
June 12, 2012	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 24 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; and granting defendant Sam Artioli's 18 Motion for summary judgment. This case remains referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for adjudication of the plaintiff's remaining claims. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/12/2012. (cc: pro se plaintiff; pro se defendant Sam Artioli; pro se defendant Invent Tech, 2655 Lejune Road, Suite 550, Coral Gables, FL 33134; Brett Pollack, Esq., 9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor, Miami, FL 33156; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 11, 2012

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 27 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; directing that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/11/2012. (cc: pro se plaintiff; Invent Tech at 2655 Lejune Road Suite 550, Coral Gables, Florida 33134; Brett Pollack, Esq., at 9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor, Miami, Florida 33153; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)

June 12, 2012

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 24 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; and granting defendant Sam Artioli's 18 Motion for summary judgment. This case remains referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for adjudication of the plaintiff's remaining claims. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/12/2012. (cc: pro se plaintiff; pro se defendant Sam Artioli; pro se defendant Invent Tech, 2655 Lejune Road, Suite 550, Coral Gables, FL 33134; Brett Pollack, Esq., 9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor, Miami, FL 33156; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Invent-Tech et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Invent Tech
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sam Artioli
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brent Alan Peterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?