Taylor v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Charlene Logan Taylor
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00376
Filed: February 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 300 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Teri Longacre, M.D.) The 140 MOTION by Charlene Logan Taylor to Exclude Case Specific Expert Testimony of Dr. Teri Longacre is DENIED in part and RESERVED in part, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/10/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)
March 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 294 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment) The 121 MOTION by Charlene Logan Taylor for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant Ethicon, Inc.'s Separate Defenses is GRANTED as it relates to defenses 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 24, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 42, 45, 49, 50, 51, 52, 55, 57, 60, 62, 74, 75, 78, 79, and any defenses challenging the plaintiff's claims based on federal preemption grounds. The court further ORDERS that the plaintiff's Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/31/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 291 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motions in Limine) The plaintiffs 197 Motion in Limine is GRANTED in part as to Motion in Limine No. 1 and any other conceded motion therein; the remainder of the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. The defendants [195 ] Motion in Limine is GRANTED in part as to Motion in Limine No. 2 and any other conceded motion therein; the remainder of the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. The defendants 193 Motion to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiffs Allegations of Spoliation is GRANTED. The defendants 277 Motion for Leave to File a Reply is DENIED as moot. The 198 Motion in Limine No. 18; the 200 Motion in Limine No. 19; 202 Motion in Limine No. 20; 204 Motion in Limine No. 21; 206 Motion in Limine No. 22; [ 208] Motion in Limine No. 23; 210 Motion in Limine No. 24; 212 Motion in Limine No. 25; 214 Motion in Limine No. 26; 216 Motion in Limine No. 27; 218 Motion in Limine No. 28; 220 Motion in Limine No. 29; 222 Motion in Limine No. 30; [22 4] Motion in Limine No. 31; 226 Motion in Limine No. 32; 228 Motion in Limine No. 33; 230 Motion in Limine No. 34; 232 Motion in Limine No. 35; 234 Motion in Limine No. 36; 236 Motion in Limine No. 37; 238 Motion in Limine No. 38; 240 Motion in Limine No. 39; 242 Motion in Limine No. 40 ; 244 Motion in Limine No. 41; and 246 Motion in Limine No. 42 are GRANTED insofar as they are conceded and are otherwise DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/6/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
October 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 289 ORDER (Order re: Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation) denying 124 MOTION by Charlene Logan Taylor for Sanctions for the Spoliation of William Martin's Custodial File, as more fully set forth herein; the Court directs the Clerk to post a copy of this published opinion on the court's website, www.wvsd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/6/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)
September 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 288 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Shelby Thames, Ph.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 1 Cases to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Shelby Thames, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/2/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (bdr)
September 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 287 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Roger McLendon, M.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Daubert Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 1 Cases to Exclude or, in the Alternative, to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Roger McLendon, M.D., as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/1/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (mek)
August 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 284 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Daniel Elliott, M.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 to Exclude Certain General Opinions of Daniel Elliott, M.D., as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/26/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (bdr)
August 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 283 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: E. Stanton Shoemaker, M.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 1 Cases to Exclude Certain General Opinions of E. Stanton Shoemaker, M.D., as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/25/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (jk)
August 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 281 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Prof. Dr. Med. Uwe Klinge) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson To Limit the Testimony of Prof. Dr. Med. Uwe Klinge in Wave 1 Cases, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/24/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (mmw)
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER denying 80 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Strike All Expert Reports of Dr. Vladimir Iakovlev and REQUEST for Immediate Hearing, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/10/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlene Logan Taylor
Represented By: Tracy W. Houck
Represented By: Ronald L. Riggle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Represented By: Philip J. Combs
Represented By: Sarah A. Martin
Represented By: Stephanie D. Thacker
Represented By: David B. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Represented By: Philip J. Combs
Represented By: Sarah A. Martin
Represented By: Stephanie D. Thacker
Represented By: David B. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?