Fitzgerald et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Alina Fitzgerald and Christopher Fitzgerald |
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and John Doe Corporations 1-50 |
2:2012cv01371 |
May 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER granting the Motion by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 2 Cases to Strike Dr. Shelby F. Thames' Supplemental Reports or, in the Alternative, for Leave to File a Daubert Motion Based on the Flawed Methodology Employed Therein filed in MDL 2327 at ECF No. 2882, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/28/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit A) (ts) |
Filing 54 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert ruling re: Elaine Duncan, M.D.) Directing that the Memorandum Opinion and Order (Daubert Motion re: Elaine Duncan, M.D.) entered in MDL 2327 on 8/25/2016 as to the Ethicon Wave 1 cases is ADOPTED i n the Wave 2 cases identified in Exhibit A. The Memorandum Opinion and Order (Daubert Motion re: Elaine Duncan, M.D.) is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/16/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Ethicon Wave 2 cases identified in the Exhibit attached) (mek) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.