Haddon v. Johnson & Johnson et al
| Judy Haddon |
| Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and Gynecare |
| 2:2012cv02200 |
| June 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment) The 60 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Ethicon's Motion is GRANTE D with regard to the following claims: manufacturing defect, fraud, fraudulent concealment, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of warranty, negligent infliction of emotional distress, gross negligence, and unjust enrichment. Ethicon's Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/30/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Robert Rogers, M.D.) The 64 MOTION by Judy Haddon to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Robert Rogers, M.D. is DENIED in part and RESERVED in part, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/28/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
