Hartzo et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
Debra Hartzo and Dewey Roberts |
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited |
2:2013cv10326 |
April 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 205 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment) C. R. Bard, Inc.'s 53 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Against Debra Hartzo and Dewey Roberts Whose Claims are Governed by Louisiana Law is GRANTED in regar d to the plaintiffs' claims for manufacturing defect, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, negligence, and failure to warn; and C. R. Bard, Inc.'s 55 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Punitive Damages Claims is GRANTED, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/19/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
Filing 113 ORDER Plaintiffs' 79 Omnibus Motion re: Non-Retained Corporate Experts is DENIED; Plaintiffs' 78 Omnibus Motion re: Physician Experts is DENIED; C. R. Bard's 99 Motion to Exclude is DENIED; C. R. Bard's 106 Omnibus Motio n is DENIED; and Plaintiffs' 108 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. The parties have leave to file additional expert-specific Daubert motions and the court will modify an existing PTO to reflect these deadlines. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 1/28/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.