Lewis v. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District Lewis v. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals

Lewis v. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals

Plaintiff:	Quincy Gray McMichael Lewis
Defendant:	West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Case Number:	2:2013cv13110
Filed:	June 3, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Greenbrier
Presiding Judge:	Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit:	Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 5, 2013	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER finding that Wendy J. Murphy is subject to sanctions pursuant to Rule 11; Ms. Murphy is sanctioned in the amount of $450, with payment to be made to the court within 60 days of this Order; directing the Clerk to post a copy of this published opinion on the court's website, www.wvsd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/5/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; ) (tmh)
October 21, 2013	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting defendant's 7 MOTION to Dismiss; directing plaintiff's counsel to file a memorandum with this court within 30 days to show cause why sanctions under Rule 11(b) are not warranted; the court ORDERS that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant and that this case be dismissed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/21/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 5, 2013

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER finding that Wendy J. Murphy is subject to sanctions pursuant to Rule 11; Ms. Murphy is sanctioned in the amount of $450, with payment to be made to the court within 60 days of this Order; directing the Clerk to post a copy of this published opinion on the court's website, www.wvsd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/5/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; ) (tmh)

October 21, 2013

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting defendant's 7 MOTION to Dismiss; directing plaintiff's counsel to file a memorandum with this court within 30 days to show cause why sanctions under Rule 11(b) are not warranted; the court ORDERS that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant and that this case be dismissed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/21/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quincy Gray McMichael Lewis
Represented By:	Wendy J. Murphy
Represented By:	R. Brandon Johnson
Represented By:	Randy Burton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?