Price v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Price v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Plaintiff:	Tammy Price
Defendant:	Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number:	2:2013cv30794
Filed:	December 3, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit:	Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 26, 2019	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part to the extent BSC seeks dismissal and DENIED in part insofar as BSC seeks dismissal with prejudice; BSC is dismissed without prejudice; no other defendants remain and the case is stricken from the docket and closed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/26/2019. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff) (kew)
April 11, 2017	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 6 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss for Failure to Timely Provide Plaintiff Profile Form Per PTO 16, as more fully set forth herein; plaintiff has 30 business days from the entry of this Order to submit to BSC a completed PPF; failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal upon motion by the defendant; plaintiff's counsel is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/11/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 26, 2019

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part to the extent BSC seeks dismissal and DENIED in part insofar as BSC seeks dismissal with prejudice; BSC is dismissed without prejudice; no other defendants remain and the case is stricken from the docket and closed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/26/2019. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff) (kew)

April 11, 2017

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 6 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss for Failure to Timely Provide Plaintiff Profile Form Per PTO 16, as more fully set forth herein; plaintiff has 30 business days from the entry of this Order to submit to BSC a completed PPF; failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal upon motion by the defendant; plaintiff's counsel is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/11/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Price v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Price
Represented By:	Tamara L. Banno
Represented By:	Tim K. Goss
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?