Coplen v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cathy Estes Coplen
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv31359
Filed: December 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 22 MOTION by American Medical Systems, Inc. to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Comply With Pre-Trial Order #249 is GRANTED in part to the extent AMS seeks dismissal, and DENIED insofar as AMS seeks dismissal with prejudice; the court ORDERS that the case is dismissed without prejudice and stricken from the court's docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/7/2019. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff at her last known address) (brn)
August 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 11 MOTION by American Medical Systems, Inc. to Dismiss With Prejudice for Plaintiff Cathy Estes Coplen's Failure to Comply With Pre-Trial Order # 223; the plaintiff has 30 days from the entry of this Order to submit to AMS a completed PFS with verifications and authorizations and to file a copy of the PFS in this case. The plaintiff is reminded that the PFS and other forms relevant to participating in this MDL are available at http://www.wvsd.uscourts.go v/MDL/amsinc/forms.html. Information on where to submit the PFS is also available on the courts website. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by the defendant. The plaintiff is ORDERED to advise the cou rt of her correct address by 30 days from the entry of this Order. If the plaintiff wishes to receive email notification of case activity by way of Notice of Electronic Filing in a Civil Action, she must (1) register for a PACER account at www.pacer. gov; AND (2) consent in writing to accept service by email notification of all documents (except summons and complaint, discovery materials and Rule 26 disclosures, and waive her right to personal service or service by first class mail pursuant to Fe d. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D)). This consent must be filed in this case, and the plaintiff must state that she has received the PACER account and provide her email address. Until then, or until the court obtains an updated address for the plaintiff, the defendant must serve the plaintiff by U.S. Mail at the address listed below. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/7/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested) (kp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coplen v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Estes Coplen
Represented By: Justin William Fishback
Represented By: Ethan Lee Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?