Miller v. Rubenstein et al
| Andrew Miller |
| Jim Rubenstein, David Ballard, Margaret Clifford and John Doe |
| 2:2015cv01581 |
| July 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Fayette |
| Dwane L. Tinsley |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting the defendants' 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this matter from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/27/2017. (cc: plaintiff; all counsel of record; Magistrate Judge Tinsley) (mks)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss with regard to all of the plaintiffs claims against defendants Ballard and Rubenstein, with r egard to the plaintiffs claims for monetaryrelief against defendants Clifford and Doe in their official capacities, and with regard to the plaintiffs claims for preliminary injunctive relief contained in the complaint, but otherwise denied; denying as premature defendants' alternative 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/10/2016. (cc: movant; counsel of record; magistrate judge) (tmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
