Buki v. Coloplast Corp.

Buki v. Coloplast Corp.

Plaintiff:	Eva Buki
Defendant:	Coloplast Corp.
Case Number:	2:2015cv03504
Filed:	March 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit:	Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 8, 2017	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 MOTION by Coloplast Corp. to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet; the plaintiff's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/8/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
March 10, 2017	Filing 13 ORDER Coloplast's 8 Motion to Compel and in the Alternative to Dismiss is GRANTED in part to the extent Coloplast seeks an order compelling production of the PFS and DENIED in part and without prejudice as to the remaining relief; the p laintiff must serve her completed PFS on Coloplast on or before 4/10/2017; if the plaintiff does not comply, the motion to dismiss may be granted with prejudice filed by Coloplast; Coloplast shall have through and including 3/17/2017 to file an affidavit of reasonable fees and expenses incurred in filing this Motion, as well as any supportive documentation or argument to justify the amount of fees and expenses requested; failure to timely file the affidavit and supporting documentation s hall result in a denial of fees and costs; the plaintiff shall have through and including 3/24/2017 to respond to Coloplasts submissions. The response shall include any justification that would preclude or reduce an award of expenses, or, in the al ternative, shall include a statement identifying the attorney and/or party whose conduct necessitated Coloplast's Motion; failure to file a response shall be deemed an admission of or agreement with the representations and arguments of Colopl ast; Coloplast shall have through and including 3/29/2017 to file a reply memorandum; and at the conclusion of the period allowed for briefing, the court will rule on any request for reasonable fees and costs. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/10/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 8, 2017

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 MOTION by Coloplast Corp. to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet; the plaintiff's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/8/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)

March 10, 2017

Filing 13 ORDER Coloplast's 8 Motion to Compel and in the Alternative to Dismiss is GRANTED in part to the extent Coloplast seeks an order compelling production of the PFS and DENIED in part and without prejudice as to the remaining relief; the p laintiff must serve her completed PFS on Coloplast on or before 4/10/2017; if the plaintiff does not comply, the motion to dismiss may be granted with prejudice filed by Coloplast; Coloplast shall have through and including 3/17/2017 to file an affidavit of reasonable fees and expenses incurred in filing this Motion, as well as any supportive documentation or argument to justify the amount of fees and expenses requested; failure to timely file the affidavit and supporting documentation s hall result in a denial of fees and costs; the plaintiff shall have through and including 3/24/2017 to respond to Coloplasts submissions. The response shall include any justification that would preclude or reduce an award of expenses, or, in the al ternative, shall include a statement identifying the attorney and/or party whose conduct necessitated Coloplast's Motion; failure to file a response shall be deemed an admission of or agreement with the representations and arguments of Colopl ast; Coloplast shall have through and including 3/29/2017 to file a reply memorandum; and at the conclusion of the period allowed for briefing, the court will rule on any request for reasonable fees and costs. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/10/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buki v. Coloplast Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eva Buki
Represented By:	Joseph J. Zonies
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Coloplast Corp.
Represented By:	Lana K. Varney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?