Smith v. Collection Technologies, Inc.

Smith v. Collection Technologies, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Greg Smith
Defendant:	Collection Technologies, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2015cv06816
Filed:	May 27, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	Thomas E. Johnston
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 22, 2016	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 7 MOTION to Amend the Complaint Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; directing that the ECF No. 7-1 First Amended Complaint is now the operative pleading in this matter; denying Plaintiff's 3 MOTION to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County for Fees and Costs and for a Hearing on Remand; denying Defendant's 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Attached to 1 Notice of Removal; denying as moot, Defend ant's 10 MOTION to Strike Improper Arguments in Plaintiff's 8 Reply to Response or in the Alternative, MOTION by Collection Technologies, Inc. for Leave to File Surreply; denying as moot Plaintiff's 21 MOTION for Hearing on 3 MOTION by Greg Smith to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County for Fees and Costs and for a Hearing on Remand. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/22/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (tmh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 22, 2016

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 7 MOTION to Amend the Complaint Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; directing that the ECF No. 7-1 First Amended Complaint is now the operative pleading in this matter; denying Plaintiff's 3 MOTION to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County for Fees and Costs and for a Hearing on Remand; denying Defendant's 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Attached to 1 Notice of Removal; denying as moot, Defend ant's 10 MOTION to Strike Improper Arguments in Plaintiff's 8 Reply to Response or in the Alternative, MOTION by Collection Technologies, Inc. for Leave to File Surreply; denying as moot Plaintiff's 21 MOTION for Hearing on 3 MOTION by Greg Smith to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County for Fees and Costs and for a Hearing on Remand. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/22/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (tmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Collection Technologies, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greg Smith
Represented By:	Mitchell Lee Klein
Represented By:	Benjamin Sheridan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Collection Technologies, Inc.
Represented By:	Jason David Bowles
Represented By:	Charles K. Gould
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?