Woodson v. Mirandy

Woodson v. Mirandy

Petitioner:	William M. Woodson
Respondent:	Patrick Mirandy
Case Number:	2:2015cv16254
Filed:	December 18, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Pleasants
Presiding Judge:	Omar J. Aboulhosn
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2017	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 35 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; dismissing without prejudice the 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/7/2017. (cc: plaintiff; all counsel of record; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn) (mks)
December 19, 2016	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that the 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the respondent's 14 Motion to Dismiss the Peti tion as untimely be, and it hereby is, denied. It is further ORDERED that this matter be, and it hereby is, recommitted to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/19/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2017

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 35 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; dismissing without prejudice the 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/7/2017. (cc: plaintiff; all counsel of record; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn) (mks)

December 19, 2016

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that the 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the respondent's 14 Motion to Dismiss the Peti tion as untimely be, and it hereby is, denied. It is further ORDERED that this matter be, and it hereby is, recommitted to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/19/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodson v. Mirandy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William M. Woodson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Patrick Mirandy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?